2 - Characteristic Functions, Independence, and Weak Convergence in $\mathbb{R}^d$
1. Multivariate Inversion Formula
For a random vector $X \in \mathbb{R}^d$ with characteristic function
\(\varphi_X(t) = E[e^{i\, t \cdot X}], \quad t \in \mathbb{R}^d,\)
the Fourier inversion theorem states that if $X$ has a “nice” density $f_X$, then
\(f_X(0) = \lim_{T \to \infty} (2\pi)^{-d} \int_{[-T,T]^d} \varphi_X(t)\, dt.\)
This extends the one‑dimensional inversion formula to higher dimensions.
The integral is over a $d$-dimensional cube.
2. Computing $P(X \in A)$ Using the Uniform-Subtraction Trick
Let
\(A = \prod_{i=1}^d [a_i, b_i]\)
be a $d$-dimensional rectangle with Lebesgue volume $\lambda(A)$.
Let:
- $U \sim \mathrm{Unif}(A)$ independent of $X$,
- define $Y = X - U$.
Then: \(f_Y(0) = \frac{P(X \in A)}{\lambda(A)}.\)
Because $U$ has density
\(f_U(u) = \frac{1}{\lambda(A)} \quad \text{for } u \in A,\)
its characteristic function factorizes:
\(\varphi_U(t) = \prod_{k=1}^d \varphi_{U_k}(t_k).\)
The characteristic function of $Y$ is: \(\varphi_Y(t) = E[e^{i t \cdot (X-U)}] = \varphi_X(t)\, \varphi_U(-t).\)
Applying inversion: \(P(X \in A) = \lambda(A)(2\pi)^{-d} \lim_{T \to \infty} \int_{[-T,T]^d} \varphi_X(t)\, \varphi_U(-t)\, dt.\)
This works because $Y$ is bounded and thus integrable.
3. Independence and Characteristic Functions
Let $Z = (Z_1, \dots, Z_d)$.
Then the following are equivalent:
- The components $Z_1,\dots,Z_d$ are independent.
- The characteristic function factorizes: \(\varphi_Z(t) = \prod_{k=1}^d \varphi_{Z_k}(t_k).\)
This is one of the most powerful and useful characterizations of independence.
4. Example: A Joint Distribution That Is Not Independent
If a joint distribution table has marginals that look uniform but entries do not factor as
\(P(Z_1 = i, Z_2 = j) \neq P(Z_1 = i)P(Z_2=j),\)
then independence fails.
Characteristic functions detect this automatically because the factorization will fail.
5. Weak Convergence in $\mathbb{R}^d$
Weak convergence (convergence in distribution) of random vectors: \(X_n \Rightarrow X\) means: \(E[f(X_n)] \to E[f(X)] \quad \forall f \in C_b(\mathbb{R}^d).\)
This condition is equivalent to several others.
These equivalences form the Portmanteau Theorem.
Portmanteau Theorem (Multivariate Version)
The following are equivalent:
-
$X_n \Rightarrow X$.
-
For every closed set $F \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, \(\limsup_{n \to \infty} P(X_n \in F) \le P(X \in F).\)
-
For every open set $O \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, \(\liminf_{n \to \infty} P(X_n \in O) \ge P(X \in O).\)
-
For every continuity set $A\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ satisfying
\(P(X \in \partial A)=0,\) we have
\(P(X_n \in A) \to P(X \in A).\)
Boundary of a set
\(\partial A = \overline{A} \setminus A^\circ.\)
This is exactly the set where convergence is “unstable”—the probability mass must not accumulate there.
6. Why the Quantile (Skorokhod) Representation Fails in $d > 1$
In one dimension:
- You can take $U \sim {\rm Uniform}(0,1)$,
- Define $Y_n = F_{X_n}^{-1}(U)$ and $Y = F_X^{-1}(U)$.
Then:
- $Y_n \stackrel{d}{=} X_n$,
- $Y \stackrel{d}{=} X$,
- $Y_n \to Y$ almost surely.
This is because 1‑dimensional distributions are totally ordered.
In higher dimensions:
- There is no multivariate quantile function with these monotonicity properties.
- There is no canonical order on $\mathbb{R}^d$.
- Thus the simple quantile construction cannot be extended.
Skorokhod’s Representation Theorem still works in $\mathbb{R}^d$, but it uses a much more sophisticated construction (not quantiles).
7. Key Takeaways
Characteristic Functions
- $\varphi_X(t) = E[e^{i t\cdot X}]$ determines the law of $X$.
- Independence ⇔ factorization.
Inversion
- Recover density at 0 via Fourier inversion.
- Compute $P(X \in A)$ using the uniform shift trick.
Convergence in Distribution
- Portmanteau Theorem gives all equivalent formulations.
- Continuity sets matter.
- Quantile tricks fail in $\mathbb{R}^d$ because no natural order exists.
8. Suggested Items for Your Prelim Survival Guide
- Independence via characteristic function factorization.
- Uniform-subtraction trick for computing probabilities of rectangles.
- Full multivariate Portmanteau theorem.
- Statement of why 1D quantile coupling does not generalize.
If you want, I can add diagrams, examples, or a micro-cheat-sheet summarizing only the formulas you must memorize for exam speed.
Comments